Overview
It
is important that work commences on a stage only when the Project Board says it
should; this avoids the problems of projects continuing just because no one
thinks to stop them.
To
enable this to happen, the project should be broken down into manageable
sections (stages) at the end of which the Project Board has to approve whether
work is to continue or not.
It
is also important to spot problems early and react to them.
This
process authorises every stage (except the Initiation Stage) plus any Exception
Plans that are raised.
The
objective of this process is to decide whether to authorise the next stage of
work, and hence commit the required resources, based on:
|
|
A view of the current
status of the project |
|
|
A detailed forecast of
the commitment of resources required by, and the products to be created from,
the next stage of the project |
|
|
A re-assessment of the
likely project end date |
|
|
A re-assessment of the
risk situation |
|
|
A re-assessment of the
Business Case and the chances of achieving the expected benefits. |
The
current status of the project is usually presented by the Project Manager covering
the results of the last stage compared to expectations.
The
detailed forecast comes from the plan for the next stage, for which the Project
Manager is seeking approval. The detailed forecast should match the updated or
revised Project Plan.
The
updated Project Plan and Business Case are compared with what they were at the
start of the project (and at the start of the last stage) to check that the
project is still viable.
Any
changes to the Business Case defined in the
Project Directive must be communicated
to corporate or programme management.
The
process may also be invoked when the stage or project is forecast to exceed its
tolerance levels. Early warning of such a situation should have been given to
the Project Board via an Exception
Report,
see Project Controls for a full explanation.
An
Exception Report explains the cause of the deviation and the current situation,
the options, the Project
Manager's recommendation and the impact on the Project
Plan, Business Case and Risks.
In
the case of a stage being forecast to exceed its tolerances the Project Manager
will ask the Project Board to authorise an Exception
Plan. As with a Stage Plan, the Exception Plan should be accompanied by an updated
Project Plan,
Business Case and Risk Log.
If
the forecast is for the project to deviate beyond its tolerances, the Project
Board must consider its brief and decide if the matter has to be referred
upwards. As part of the exception process the
Project Board has to secure any
necessary decisions from outside the project. For example, if this project is
part of a programme the programme support office will have to examine the
likely impact on the programme and take appropriate action following approval
by the Programme Chairman or Director as necessary.
Once
authorised, an Exception Plan becomes the current
Stage Plan.
Before
authorising a Stage or Exception Plan the
Project Board must ensure that
changes in the corporate environment, which may impact on the project or its
Business Case are brought to the attention of the Project Manager and dealt
with effectively.
The
Project Board has full responsibility for the process, based on information
provided by the Project
Manager.
|
Management information |
Usage |
Explanation |
|
Input |
Plan for which the Project Manager is seeking approval |
|
|
Product Checklist |
Input |
Summary list of major products to be produced by the plan with key dates |
|
Updated Product Plan |
Input |
To allow the Project Board to review the whole project status |
|
Updated Business Case |
Input |
To allow the Project Board to check that the project is still justified |
|
Input |
Used to provide a baseline against which to assess the advisability of any deviations |
|
|
Project Management Team changes (included within Stage Plan) |
Input |
To allow the Project Board to ratify any appointment changes |
|
Updated Risk Log |
Input |
Check that the risks are still acceptable |
|
Input |
Report of stage just completed. Helps assessment of current situation. (There would not be one of these for the Initiation Stage) |
|
|
Authorisation to proceed |
Sign off |
Authorisation to proceed with the submitted plan. During Project Initiation the Project Board decides how formal or informal it wishes the approval to be. The Project Board, of course, has the authority to reject the plan. It may ask for a re-submission or decide to close the project |
|
|
Was everything expected
of the current stage delivered? If not, was this with the approval of the
Project Board? |
|
|
Are there clear statements
about what is to be done about anything not delivered? Is it covered by a
Project Issue? Is its delivery included in the Next Stage
Plan? |
|
|
Is the project still
viable and does it remain focused on the same business need? |
|
|
Are the risks still
acceptable? |
|
|
Are the countermeasures
still valid, including any contingency
plans? |
|
|
Does the Project Board
want to, and is it able to, commit the resources needed for the next stage of
work? |
|
|
In projects that have a different
Supplier for each stage, is it documented and agreed by all Suppliers that
the key project information will be made available to subsequent Suppliers? |