Assessing Progress

Overview

In order to make informed decisions and exercise rational control, it is necessary to know what has actually happened, to be compared with what it was hoped would happen. Project management can become dominated by 'fire fighting' and day-to-day problem solving. This can result in Project Managers losing sight of the overall goal. It is vital that this is countered by a steady flow of information that fills in the bigger picture, and simple, robust monitoring systems to supply the information.

Context

Assessing Progress monitors the status of resources and allocated work, and reviews the Quality Log (as updated by the quality checks carried out by the team(s)). It also keeps the Stage Plan up to date.

Process Description

The objective of assessing progress is to maintain an accurate and current picture of:

*

Progress on the work being carried out

*

The status of resources

by receiving and reviewing progress information from the Team Manager(s).

In order to achieve the objectives, various steps have to be undertaken:

*

Collect in all progress information for all work currently being undertaken

*

Collect feedback on recent quality checking activities carried out

*

Assess the estimated time and effort to complete any unfinished. work (including that not yet started)

*

Assess the availability of resources in the period under review and. for the remainder of the stage (or project)

*

Review with the Team Manager(s) whether work will be completed on time and to budget

*

Update the Stage Plan with actuals to date

*

Identify any points that need attention.

The main data-gathering control for Project Manager is the Checkpoint, described in the Project Controls chapter. Team Managers can also use the Assessing Progress process within their teams. The information is then passed to the Project Manager in a Checkpoint Report.

Responsibilities

The Project Manager is responsible, assisted by any support roles, with input from Team Managers.

Information Needs

Management information

Usage

Explanation

Checkpoint Reports

Input

Flows of information, either written or verbal depending on the need for formality. The information will cover current status against plan

Quality Log

Input

Confirmation, or otherwise, from the Team Manager(s) that the work and products have been produced to the quality standard specified

Stage Plan

Update

Updated with actuals to date and forecasts

Key Criteria

*

Is the level and frequency of progress assessment right for the stage

*

Is the information timely, useful and accurate?

*

Are the estimates of outstanding work objective?